Freewill is a tricky concept of philosophy but now is it the sacred cow of neuroscience?
Much of freewill has been curtailed by man-made laws otherwise there would be no law and order. If you had the freewill to strike another person or drive your car beyond the speed limit, but if you did these acts are you still responsible for it or is it your brain that is responsible for it? You can have some points of view on this subject by a free read in the Economist's leader Liberalism and Neurology.
Comments